The honest comparison

Build it, buy it, or hire it. Here is the honest version.

You have four ways to get AI into the commercial side of your business. We only fit one of them. Here is the straight read on all four, including when we are the wrong call.

Cheap is not freeDIY costs you in lost weeks, not licence fees.
Hiring is slow£80k and six months before anything ships.
Agencies serve their engineNot your numbers. We come from your side.
The four alternatives

All five, side by side.

No spin. Where each one wins, where each one hurts, and where we fit.

OptionReal costTime to valueWho does the thinkingCommercial fitStays after handover
DIY / ChatGPTCheap to start, costly in lost timeWeeks of trial and errorYou, off the side of your deskYou know the business, not the buildIt is yours to maintain
In-house hire£80k to £120k plus rampMonths before real outputThem, once they are up to speedStrong, if you can keep them busyYes, while they stay
Traditional agencyRetainer, often open-endedSlow, layered through account managersTheir strategists, off your floorBuilt for their process, not your numbersUntil the retainer ends
Freelance builderDay rate, cheap per hourFast to start buildingYou decide what, they build itCode-first, not business-firstNo, they move to the next gig
The operator model£3k to £15k, fixed per outcomeShipped in weeksWe do, from the commercial sideWe come from your side of the businessYes, warranty plus an optional seat
The honest take

What each one is actually good for

DIY / ChatGPT

Good for

Getting a feel for what AI can do, and speeding up one-off tasks for one person.

Where it breaks

ChatGPT helps a person do a task faster. It does not change how the business runs. Teams that build it themselves tend to end up with a dozen disconnected workflows and abandoned pilots within ninety days. The problem was never access to AI. It is turning AI into operational change, and that is a different job.

In-house hire

Good for

A long run of AI work that justifies a full salary on the payroll.

Where it breaks

An in-house AI hire is £80k to £120k, plus six months to ramp, plus the overhead of keeping them busy. Most teams of 10 to 50 are not there yet. You need one outcome shipped, not a headcount. We help you get to the point where the hire pays for itself.

Traditional agency

Good for

Brand campaigns and big creative pushes run through a managed team.

Where it breaks

Agencies optimise for their process and their content engine, not your numbers. You get strategists removed from your floor, layered through account managers, on a retainer that rarely ends. We optimise for the metric you care about, then get out of the way.

Freelance builder

Good for

A clearly specced job where you already know exactly what to build.

Where it breaks

A freelancer puts hands on a keyboard and builds what you tell them. They will not tell you which problems are worth solving. That is code-first, not business-first. Pick the wrong thing to automate and you get a working build of the wrong thing.

When we are not the answer

Sometimes one of the others is the right call.

If you have a multi-year AI roadmap, hire. If you just need a faster draft, ChatGPT is fine. If the fix is a tidier process or a tool you already pay for, we will tell you that and charge you nothing.

We only take the build when we can name the number it will move. If we cannot, we say so. That is the whole point of the operator model.

Not sure which one you need?

Send us one workflow eating your team's time. We will show you what we would automate and what it is worth, free, within 48 hours. If the answer is do not build it, we will say so.